Report of the ISTH registry on pregnancy and COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (COV-PREG-COAG).

Background: Concerns about COVID-19-associated coagulopathy (CAC) in pregnant individuals were raised in early pandemic. Methods: An ISTH-sponsored COVID-19 coagulopathy in pregnancy (COV-PREG-COAG) international registry was developed to describe incidence of coagulopathy, VTE, and anticoagulation in this group. Results: All pregnant patients with COVID-19 from participating centers were entered, providing 430 pregnancies for the first pandemic wave. Isolated abnormal coagulation parameters were seen in 20%; more often with moderate/severe disease than asymptomatic/mild disease (49% vs 15%; p < 0.0001). No one met the ISTH criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC), though 5/21 (24%) met the pregnancy DIC score. There was no difference in antepartum hemorrhage (APH) with asymptomatic/mild disease versus moderate/severe disease (3.4% vs 7.7%; p = 0.135). More individuals with moderate/severe disease experienced postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) (22.4% vs 9.3%; p = 0.006). There were no arterial thrombotic events. Only one COVID-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE) was reported. Conclusions: Low rates of coagulopathy, bleeding, and thrombosis were observed among pregnant people in the first pandemic wave.

Spontaneous uterine rupture complicated by bilateral pulmonary emboli: A case report.

Spontaneous uterine rupture in unscarred uteri complicated by pulmonary emboli is a rare event with major maternal morbidity and mortality. This is a case of a 32-year-old woman, G1P0, at term, with no pertinent past medical/surgical history, who underwent an emergency cesarean delivery for failed induction of labor complicated by uterine rupture. Post-operatively, the patient was tachycardic and hypoxic. CT arteriogram revealed massive bilateral pulmonary emboli, and she was transferred for specialist care. An emergency pulmonary embolectomy and implantation of an extracorporeal right ventricular assist device were performed. Once the patient was clinically stable, an evaluation for thrombophilias and collagen disorders was done, and was positive for a variant of unknown significance in the ELN gene (c.205G > C). This case report highlights a potential connection between uterine ruptures, hemorrhage, and multiple, large pulmonary emboli. The authors propose a multidisciplinary discussion and evaluation to identify risk factors and biologic causes for these rare but life-threatening complications.

Grand Multiparity and Obstetric Outcomes in a Contemporary Cohort: The Role of Increasing Parity.

OBJECTIVE: Evidence is inconsistent regarding grand multiparity and its association with adverse obstetric outcomes. Few large American cohorts of grand multiparas have been studied. We assessed if increasing parity among grand multiparas is associated with increased odds of adverse perinatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective cohort of patients with parity ≥ 5 who delivered a singleton gestation in New York City from 2011 to 2019. Outcomes included postpartum hemorrhage, preterm delivery, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, shoulder dystocia, birth weight > 4,000 and <2,500 g, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Parity was analyzed continuously, and multivariate analysis determined if increasing parity and other obstetric variables were associated with each adverse outcome. RESULTS: There were 2,496 patients who met inclusion criteria. Increasing parity among grand multiparas was not associated with any of the prespecified adverse outcomes. Odds of postpartum hemorrhage increased with history (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.65, 95% confidence interval [1.83, 3.84]) and current cesarean delivery (aOR: 4.59 [3.40, 6.18]). Preterm delivery was associated with history (aOR: 12.36 [8.70-17.58]) and non-White race (aOR: 1.90 [1.27, 2.84]). Odds of shoulder dystocia increased with history (aOR: 5.89 [3.22, 10.79]) and birth weight > 4,000 g (aOR: 9.94 [6.32, 15.65]). Birth weight > 4,000 g was associated with maternal obesity (aOR: 2.92 [2.22, 3.84]). Birth weight < 2,500 g was associated with advanced maternal age (aOR: 1.69 [1.15, 2.48]), chronic hypertension (aOR: 2.45 [1.32, 4.53]), and non-White race (aOR: 2.47 [1.66, 3.68]). Odds of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy increased with advanced maternal age (aOR: 1.79 [1.25, 2.56]), history (aOR: 10.09 [6.77-15.04]), and non-White race (aOR: 2.79 [1.95, 4.00]). NICU admission was associated with advanced maternal age (aOR: 1.47 [1.06, 2.02]) and non-White race (aOR: 2.57 [1.84, 3.58]). CONCLUSION: Among grand multiparous patients, the risk factor for adverse maternal, obstetric, and neonatal outcomes appears to be occurrence of those adverse events in a prior pregnancy and not increasing parity itself. KEY POINTS: · Increasing parity is not associated with adverse obstetric outcomes among grand multiparas.. · Prior adverse pregnancy outcome is a risk factor for the outcome among grand multiparas.. · Advanced maternal age is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes among grand multiparas..

Piloting a prenatal care smartphone application and care navigation intervention at a federally qualified health center.

BACKGROUND: Given that smartphones are widely used among reproductive-age people of all socioeconomic backgrounds, a smartphone application may be a useful supplement to routine prenatal care. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the implementation of a smartphone app that offers patient education, depression screening, social determinants of health screening, and care coordination as an adjunct to routine prenatal care at a federally qualified health center. We further sought to characterize app engagement and the association of app use with pregnancy outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: The implementation of the smartphone app was a quality improvement initiative in which the app was made available to all people receiving prenatal care at a designated federally qualified health center between December 2020 and December 2021. Individuals who both initiated prenatal care at this site before 28 weeks of gestation and delivered at our institution during the above-defined period were studied retrospectively after obtaining institutional approval. Summary statistics were used to describe app implementation and information regarding social determinants of health and depression screening. Demographics and maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between app enrollees and patients receiving prenatal care at the same site who were not enrolled in the app. Data were analyzed using the 2-sample t test to compare continuous variables and the chi-square test to compare categorical variables. RESULTS: Overall, 800 patients receiving prenatal care at the federally qualified health center during the identified period were telephonically approached for enrollment in the smartphone app. A total of 613 people (76.6%) were successfully reached, and of those successfully reached, 538 (87.7%) accepted enrollment in the app; 76.6% of app enrollees (n=412) completed at least 1 social determinants of health screen. Of those, 29.1% (n=120) screened positive for at least 1 need. Of those with positive screens, 51.7% (n=62) accepted referral to resources to address the identified need. Furthermore, 81% of app enrollees (n=443) completed at least 1 depression screen. Of those, 13.1% (n=58) screened positive for depression, and 37.9% (n=22) of those with positive screens accepted a referral to behavioral health services. A total of 483 people met the inclusion criteria for retrospective review: 264 were enrolled in the smartphone app and 219 were not. App enrollees were more likely to speak English (79.9% of app group vs 61.6% of the non-app group; P<.0001), identify as Hispanic (52.7% vs 39.7%; P=.02), and be privately insured (24.6% vs 15.5%; P=.005), and less likely to have a social determinants of health-related need (10.0% vs 21.0%; P=.01). There were no significant differences in mode of delivery or maternal and neonatal outcomes between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of patients receiving care through our federally qualified health center enrolled in and used the smartphone app and its associated care coordination. This could be a useful tool to screen for depression and adverse social determinants of health in underserved communities. Given that individuals of higher-resource backgrounds seem more likely to enroll in smartphone apps, a more targeted approach is needed to help connect patients of lower-resource backgrounds to smartphone apps and the resources that they offer.

Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Perinatal Outcomes Across the Pandemic at an Academic Medical Center in New York City.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate perinatal complications associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection during pregnancy in the four major waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the Bronx, New York. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included all patients who delivered at a single academic medical center between March 1, 2020, and February 13, 2022. SARS-CoV-2 positivity was defined as a positive SARS-CoV-2 test result during pregnancy. Primary outcomes were preterm birth, low birth weight, stillbirth, cesarean delivery, and preeclampsia associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Secondary analyses examined outcomes by predominant variant at the time of infection. Group differences in categorical variables were tested using χ 2 tests. RESULTS: Of the 8,983 patients who delivered, 638 (7.1%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy. Age, race, ethnicity, and major comorbidities did not differ significantly between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative cohorts ( P >.05). Primary outcomes did not differ between the SARS-CoV-2-positive and SARS-CoV-2-negative cohorts ( P >.05). There was a marked increase in positive SARS-CoV-2 test results in individuals who gave birth during the Omicron wave (140/449, 31.2%). However, among patients who tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection, the preterm birth rate during the Omicron wave (9.9%) was significantly lower than during the original wave (20.3%) and the Alpha (18.4%) wave ( P <.05). Vaccination rates were low before the Omicron wave and rose to 47.2% during the Omicron wave among individuals hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Finally, second-trimester infection was significantly associated with worse perinatal outcomes compared with third-trimester infection ( P <.05). CONCLUSION: There was a general trend toward improvement in preterm birth rates across the pandemic among pregnant patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The Omicron variant was more infectious, but the preterm birth rate during the Omicron wave was low compared with that during the original wave and the Alpha wave.

Association Between Obesity and Fetal Acidosis at Scheduled Cesarean Delivery.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether patients with obesity who undergo scheduled cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia are at increased risk for umbilical artery pH less than 7.1 and base deficit 12 mmol or greater. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of individuals who delivered a term, singleton, nonanomalous neonate at one of four academic medical centers in New York City from 2013 to 2019 by scheduled cesarean under neuraxial anesthesia for whom fetal cord blood gas results were available. The primary study outcome was rate of fetal acidosis , defined as umbilical artery pH less than 7.1. This was compared between patients with obesity (body mass index [BMI] 30 or higher) and those without obesity (BMI lower than 30). Base deficit 12 mmol or greater and a composite of fetal acidosis and base deficit 12 mmol or greater were also compared. Secondary outcomes included neonatal intensive care unit admission rate, 5-minute Apgar score less than 7, and neonatal morbidity. Associations between maternal BMI and study outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic or linear regression and adjusted for age, race and ethnicity, insurance type, cesarean delivery order number, and neuraxial anesthesia type. RESULTS: Of the 6,264 individuals who met inclusion criteria during the study interval, 3,098 had obesity and 3,166 did not. The overall rate of umbilical artery cord pH less than 7.1 was 2.5%, and the overall rate of umbilical artery base deficit 12 mmol or greater was 1.5%. Patients with obesity were more likely to have umbilical artery cord pH less than 7.1 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.7, 95% CI 1.8-4.2) and umbilical artery base deficit 12 mmol or greater (aOR 3.2, 95% CI 1.9-5.3). This association was not significantly attenuated after additional adjustments for potential mediators, including maternal medical comorbidities. We found no differences in secondary outcomes between groups. CONCLUSION: Maternal obesity is associated with increased odds of arterial pH less than 7.1 and base deficit 12 mmol or greater at the time of scheduled cesarean delivery under neuraxial anesthesia.

Pregnant and Postpartum People with Substance Use Disorders: Understanding the Obstetrical Care Provider' s Roles and Responsibilities.

Peripartum individuals with substance misuse are a high-risk population that challenge clinicians and child welfare specialists alike. Federal legislation was updated in 2016 with the Comprehensive Addiction Recovery Act (CARA) to improve care via expanded screening and treatment referrals for peripartum women with substance misuse. The implementation of CARA requires providers to update their policies and procedures in order to meet the requirements outlined by this legislation. As this is a new process, this paper reviews the new administrative reporting and safety planning requirements relevant to obstetrical care providers and provides examples of best practice for different clinical scenarios. Given the variable state laws, confidentiality concerns, influence of stigma and health inequities on substance use treatment, and the fragmented healthcare system, implementation of CARA will challenge obstetric, pediatric, and mental health care providers along with child welfare services. All entities involved must work together to create effective and efficient protocols to address the CARA requirements. Health systems must also evaluate and update methods and interventions to assure that policies improve family stability and well-being.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Pregnant Women with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in New York City: A Matched Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the association between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and preterm birth, cesarean birth, and composite severe maternal morbidity by studying women with and without SARS-CoV-2 infection at the time of delivery hospitalization from similar residential catchment areas in New York City. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women with laboratory-confirmed or laboratory-denied SARS-CoV-2 on nasopharyngeal swab under universal testing policies at the time of admission who gave birth between March 13 and May 15, 2020, at two New York City medical centers. Demographic and clinical data were collected and follow-up was completed on May 30, 2020. Groups were compared for the primary outcome and preterm birth, in adjusted (for age, race/ethnicity, nulliparity, body mass index) and unadjusted analyses. RESULTS: Among this age-matched cohort, 164 women were positive and 247 were negative for SARS-CoV-2. Of the positive group, 52.4% were asymptomatic and 1.2% had critical coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The groups did not differ by race and ethnicity, body mass index, or acute or chronic comorbidities. Women with SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to be publicly insured. Preterm birth, cesarean birth, and severe maternal morbidity did not differ between groups. Babies born to women with SARS-CoV-2 were more likely to have complications of prematurity or low birth weight (7.7 vs. 2%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Preterm and cesarean birth did not differ between women with and without SARS-CoV-2 across disease severity in adjusted and unadjusted analysis among this cohort during the pandemic peak in New York City.

Healing Our Own: A Randomized Trial to Assess Benefits of Peer Support.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to develop and evaluate a structured peer support program to address the needs of providers involved in obstetric adverse outcomes. METHODS: In this pilot randomized controlled trial, participants were providers who experienced an obstetric-related adverse outcome. Providers were randomly assigned to routine support (no further follow-up) or enhanced support (follow-up with a trained peer supporter). Participants completed surveys at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. The primary outcome was the use of resources and the perception of their helpfulness. Secondary outcomes were the effect on the recovery stages and the duration of use of peer support. RESULTS: Fifty participants were enrolled and randomly assigned 1:1 to each group; 42 completed the program (enhanced, 23; routine, 19). The 2 groups were not significantly different with respect to event type, demographics, or baseline stage; in both groups, most participants started at the stage 6 thriving path. Most participants required less than 3 months of support: 65.2% did not need follow-up after the first contact, and 91.3% did not need follow-up after the second contact. Participants who transitioned from an early stage of recovery (stages 1-3) to the stage 6 thriving path reported that they most often sought support from peers (P = 0.02) and departmental leadership (P = 0.07). Those in the enhanced support group were significantly more likely to consider departmental leadership as one of the most helpful resources (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: For supporting health care providers involved in adverse outcomes, structured peer support is a practicable intervention that can be initiated with limited resources.

COVID-related "lockdowns" and birth rates in New York.

OBJECTIVE: Recent analyses have suggested that the number of births in the United States may decrease substantially in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.1 Some of this decline may be attributable to economic disruptions that are often linked to lowered birth rates.1 However to the best of our knowledge, empirical data to validate these projections and to look more specifically at the consequences of "lockdowns," have not yet been published. The objective of our study was to compare the birth rates in New York City and Long Island hospitals during the 9 months after the lockdown, to the birth rates during the same time frames in previous years. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of live births from hospitals in the New York City Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Consortium, an ongoing collaboration at several hospitals in New York City and Long Island. This consortium captures approximately one-third of the births in New York City (eg, of the 117,013 births recorded in 2017, 42,680 [36.6%] were from this consortium). To evaluate whether the lockdown in New York City (the first in the United States) between March 2020 and June 2020 resulted in a change in the number of births after the lockdown, we calculated the total live births 9 months after the lockdown (between December 2020 and February 2021) and compared the number with the total in the same 3 months during the previous 4 years. Fourteen hospitals with a total of greater than 55,000 annualized live births were included. Time series regression was performed to test the birth trends and to determine whether any change was a part of an ongoing trend. RESULTS: Figure 1 shows the total live births in the different time frames. There were 12,099 live births that occurred between December 2020 and February 2021. This is 2994 (19.8%) less live births than the previous year. In addition, the average number of live births in the 4 years before the study period was 15,101 births. This decrease was seen in all the hospitals included in the cohort. The hospitals located within New York City (N=10) had a larger drop in birth rate in the last 2 years (-1947, 18.9%) than in the hospitals located in Long Island (N=4) (-581, 13.4%). Figure 2 represents the total live births by individual hospitals in the different time frames. Among the entire cohort, the largest drop in birth rate in the previous years was only 4.9%. In addition, there was no significant trend in the number of births in the previous years (P=.586). Furthermore, no significant trend was identified in the hospitals located in New York City or Long Island (P=.831 and P=.178, respectively). Hospitals with large numbers of Medicaid-funded births showed the same trend as hospitals with smaller numbers of such births. CONCLUSION: Nine months after the lockdown was implemented, we observed a nearly 20% decrease in live births than the previous year. Although these data demonstrate a decline that is even greater than previously projected by analysts,1 there are several issues that should be considered. Firstly, the relationship between lockdowns and preterm birth is unclear, because we did not evaluate the birth outcomes, and thus, we cannot comment on preterm birth. However, most data do not suggest a major effect in the direction of more preterm births.2-4 We are unable to comment on the outmigration of pregnant women to other hospitals, the 3 accredited free-standing birth centers in New York City, or other geographic areas. However, the estimates on the outmigration data were less than the decrease we found. Using anonymized smartphone location data of approximately 140,000 New York City residents, a company specializing in geospatial analysis found that approximately 5% of New York City residents left New York City between March and May, with the majority moving to surrounding locations in the Northeast and to South Florida.5 The steeper decrease in live births in hospitals located in New York City than in those located in Long Island may be related to the population density and the recommended social distancing practices. The population density is higher in New York City than in Long Island (27,000 people per square mile vs 2360 people per square mile). Thus, the lockdown may have had a reduced effect on the number of live births in areas with a lower population density. In addition, most of the New York City residents outmigrated to surrounding locations including Long Island, which may have diminished the decrease in live births. Our data clearly demonstrate that there were significant changes in the number of births in the 9 months after the nation's first lockdown. Although we cannot definitively determine the contributions of migration, family choice, or other factors to those changes, these preliminary findings should provide direction to future studies. That work should consider zip codes, parities, and other factors that might exaggerate or mitigate the trends we report here.

Noninvasive monitoring of uterine electrical activity among patients with obesity: a new external monitoring device.

BACKGROUND: Tocodynamometry is a common, noninvasive tool used to measure contraction frequency; however, its utility is often limited in patients with obesity. An intrauterine pressure catheter provides a more accurate measurement of uterine contractions but requires ruptured membranes, limiting its utility during early latent labor. Electrical uterine myography has shown promise as a noninvasive contraction monitor with efficacy similar to that of the intrauterine pressure catheter; however, its efficacy has not been widely studied in the obese population. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to validate the accuracy of electrical uterine myography by comparing it with tocodynamometry and intrauterine pressure catheters among laboring patients with obesity. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study from February 2017 to April 2018 of patients with obesity, aged 18 years or older, who were admitted to the labor unit with viable singleton pregnancies and no contraindications for electromyography. Patients were monitored simultaneously with electrical myography and tocodynamometry or intrauterine catheter for more than 30 minutes. Two blinded obstetricians reviewed the tracings. The outcomes of interest were continuous and interpretable tracing, number of contractions, and timing and duration of contractions, interpreted as point estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients were enrolled (65 tocodynamometry, 55 intrauterine catheter). Electrical myography was significantly more interpretable during a 30-minute tracing (P=.001) and detected 39% more contractions than tocodynamometry (P<.0001; 95% confidence interval, 23%-57%), whereas there was no difference in the interpretability of tracings or number of contractions between electrical myography and an intrauterine catheter (P=.16; 95% confidence interval, -0.19 to 1.19). Patients who underwent simultaneous monitoring preferred the electrical myography device over tocodynamometry. CONCLUSION: Electrical uterine myography is superior to tocodynamometry in the detection of intrapartum uterine contraction monitoring and comparable with internal contraction monitoring.

A SWIFT Method for Handing Off Obstetrical Patients on the Labor Floor.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to improve patient handoffs on the labor floor. METHODS: A prospective cohort study of obstetrics residents at Montefiore Medical Center was performed between 2012 and 2014. Labor-floor handoffs were recorded before and after didactic sessions as well as after installation of whiteboards formatted with the mnemonic SWIFT (Subject, Why?, Issues, Fetus, Tasks). Handoff transcripts were evaluated by obstetricians blinded to timing and speaker identity. An intraclass correlation coefficient accounted for evaluator differences. Data analysis was by ordinal logistic regression, the generalized estimating equations method (correlated data), and Bonferroni adjustment (multiple comparisons). RESULTS: Forty-five handoffs were evaluated (15 each predidactics, postdidactics, and postwhiteboard revision). Higher completeness scores over time were noted for admission reason, labor concerns, and task list (not statistically significant). Comprehensive score increases prelecture to postwhiteboard were seen in handoff clarity (2.81 versus 2.91) and overall quality (2.77 versus 2.81) (not statistically significant). A subanalysis of four residents who gave multiple handoffs over different periods revealed few significant changes over time. Greater interevaluator consistency was noted with more objective elements. CONCLUSIONS: The mnemonic SWIFT, with formalized curricula for obstetrical resident training focusing on new learners and increased faculty involvement and reinforcement, may result in improvement of handoffs on the labor floor.

Use of a cesarean delivery checklist in an African maternity ward to improve management and reduce length of hospital stay†.

OBJECTIVE: To create, implement, and evaluate the effectiveness of a cesarean delivery checklist on maternal and neonatal outcomes in a rural African hospital. METHODS: Based on input from local authorities, WHO's Safe Surgical Checklist was modified for cesarean delivery and adapted for use in low-resource settings. Retrospective chart review between April and August 2013 in Kibogora Hospital, Nyamasheke, Rwanda, included the first 100 women undergoing cesarean after checklist implementation and the last 100 women undergoing cesarean before implementation. Checklist utilization was determined and degree of completeness assessed. Outcomes were compared between patients for whom the checklist was utilized and patients for whom the checklist was not utilized, in both pre and post-implementation groups. RESULTS: Checklist utilization rate was 83.0% (83/100). Checklist utilization was associated with significant increases in documentation of estimated blood loss (91.6% [76/83] vs 0.9% [1/117], P<0.001) and antibiotic administration before incision (96.4% [80/83] vs 30.8% [36/117], P<0.001). It was also associated with decreased rates of hospitalization longer than the standard 4 days (19.3% [16/83] vs 70.1% [82/117], P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Implementation of a cesarean delivery checklist via a culturally specific and resource-specific strategy resulted in high utilization rates and improved performance in key best practices by healthcare providers.

Pregnant women with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 have increased composite morbidity compared with nonpregnant matched controls.

BACKGROUND: In March 2020, as community spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 became increasingly prevalent, pregnant women seemed to be equally susceptible to developing coronavirus disease 2019. Although the disease course usually appears mild, severe and critical cases of coronavirus disease 2019 seem to lead to substantial morbidity, including intensive care unit admission with prolonged hospital stay, intubation, mechanical ventilation, and even death. Although there are recent reports regarding the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on pregnancy, there is a lack of information regarding the severity of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant vs nonpregnant women. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the outcomes of severe and critical cases of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnant vs nonpregnant, reproductive-aged women. STUDY DESIGN: This is a multicenter, retrospective, case-control study of women with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection hospitalized with severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 in 4 academic medical centers in New York City and 1 in Philadelphia between March 12, 2020, and May 5, 2020. The cases consisted of pregnant women admitted specifically for severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019 and not for obstetrical indications. The controls consisted of reproductive-aged, nonpregnant women admitted for severe or critical coronavirus disease 2019. The primary outcome was a composite morbidity that includes the following: death, a need for intubation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, or a need for high-flow nasal cannula O2 supplementation. The secondary outcomes included intensive care unit admission, length of stay, a need for discharge to long-term acute care facilities, and discharge with a home O2 requirement. RESULTS: A total of 38 pregnant women with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 polymerase chain reaction-confirmed infections were admitted to 5 institutions specifically for coronavirus disease 2019, 29 (76.3%) meeting the criteria for severe disease status and 9 (23.7%) meeting the criteria for critical disease status. The mean age and body mass index were markedly higher in the nonpregnant control group. The nonpregnant cohort also had an increased frequency of preexisting medical comorbidities, including diabetes, hypertension, and coronary artery disease. The pregnant women were more likely to experience the primary outcome when compared with the nonpregnant control group (34.2% vs 14.9%; P=.03; adjusted odds ratio, 4.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-18.2). The pregnant patients experienced higher rates of intensive care unit admission (39.5% vs 17.0%; P<.01; adjusted odds ratio, 5.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-17.5). Among the pregnant women who underwent delivery, 72.7% occurred through cesarean delivery and the mean gestational age at delivery was 33.8±5.5 weeks in patients with severe disease status and 35±3.5 weeks in patients with critical coronavirus disease 2019 status. CONCLUSION: Pregnant women with severe and critical coronavirus disease 2019 are at an increased risk for certain morbidities when compared with nonpregnant controls. Despite the higher comorbidities of diabetes and hypertension in the nonpregnant controls, the pregnant cases were at an increased risk for composite morbidity, intubation, mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit admission. These findings suggest that pregnancy may be associated with a worse outcome in women with severe and critical cases of coronavirus disease 2019. Our study suggests that similar to other viral infections such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus, pregnant women may be at risk for greater morbidity and disease severity.

Prenatally diagnosed vasa previa: association with adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Vasa previa represents a rare prenatal finding with potentially life-threatening risk to the fetus. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe the natural history of prenatally diagnosed vasa previa and evaluate the association between antenatally diagnosed vasa previa and adverse obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter descriptive and retrospective study of patients diagnosed prenatally with vasa previa on transvaginal ultrasound in the New York City Maternal-Fetal Medicine Research Consortium centers between 2012 and 2018. Outcomes evaluated included persistence of vasa previa at the time of delivery, gestational age at delivery, indications for unplanned unscheduled delivery, and neonatal course. RESULTS: A total of 165 pregnancies with vasa previa were included, of which 16 were twin gestations. Forty-three cases (26.1%) were noted to resolve on subsequent ultrasound. Of the remaining 122 cases with persistent vasa previa, 46 (37.7%) required unscheduled delivery. Twin gestations were nearly 3 times as likely to require unscheduled delivery as singleton gestations (73.3% vs 25.2%; P<.001). Most infants (70%) were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. There was 1 neonatal death (0.9%) because of complications related to prematurity. CONCLUSION: Despite the low neonatal mortality rate with prenatal detection of vasa previa, one-third of patients required unscheduled delivery, and more than half of neonates experienced complications related to prematurity.

Adding perinatal anxiety screening to depression screening: is it worth it?

BACKGROUND: Screening for peripartum depression is widely recommended and should now be the standard of care. However, little research exists on peripartum anxiety screening. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess whether adding perinatal anxiety screening would increase the identification of women who would benefit from mental health support. STUDY DESIGN: The existing practice at our clinic was depression screening via the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 at all prenatal visits; screenings were prospectively tracked for 3 months in women presenting for visit at 24-28 weeks gestation (Patient Health Questionnaire-2-only group). We then added Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item validated anxiety scale assessment to prenatal visits at 24-28 weeks gestation (Patient Health Questionnaire-2+Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item group). Our primary study outcome was the rate of positive depression and anxiety screens during pregnancy; secondary outcomes included referral rates to mental health services and obstetric and medical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 100 women with visits at 24-28 weeks gestation were eligible to be screened during the Patient Health Questionnaire-2-only period; 125 women were eligible for screening during the Patient Health Questionnaire-2+Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item period. In the Patient Health Questionnaire-2-only group, 51 women were screened, with 2 positive depression screens. In the Patient Health Questionnaire-2+Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item group, 40 women were screened, with 5 positive screens for depression and 4 for anxiety. Three women who were anxiety-positive had been negative via depression screening. Mental health referral was not different between the 2 groups (odds ratio, 1.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-4.97), but a significant increase in referral was noted for Patient Health Questionnaire-2+Generalized Anxiety Disorder 2-item subgroups with a history of mental health diagnosis (odds ratio, 14.9; 95% confidence interval, 5.6-39.7) or substance abuse (odds ratio, 26.7; 95% confidence interval, 4.6-155.0). CONCLUSION: Screening for perinatal anxiety may increase referral rates to mental health professionals who can then diagnose and treat women who experience mood and anxiety disorders. Anxiety screening may be particularly useful in populations with a history of mental health diagnoses or substance abuse. Further research is necessary to understand how perinatal anxiety screening should be best implemented.

From the trenches: inpatient management of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy.

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 has become a pandemic. It has quickly swept across the globe, leaving many clinicians to care for infected patients with limited information about the disease and best practices for care. Our goal is to share our experiences of caring for pregnant and postpartum women with novel coronavirus disease 2019 in New York, which is the coronavirus disease 2019 epicenter in the United States, and review current guidelines. We offer a guide, focusing on inpatient management, including testing policies, admission criteria, medical management, care for the decompensating patient, and practical tips for inpatient antepartum service management.

Obstetric protocols in the setting of a pandemic.

The purpose of this article is to review key areas that should be considered and modified in our obstetric protocols, specifically: 1) Patient triage, 2) Labor and delivery unit policies, 3) Special considerations for personal protective equipment (PPE) needs in obstetrics, 4) Intrapartum management, and 5) Postpartum care.